About you
Are you responding as an individual or on behalf of an organisation?
Please select one item
(Required)
Radio button:
Ticked
As an individual
Radio button:
Unticked
On behalf of an organisation*
Your name or organisation name
(Required)
Rangi Brown
Chapter 2: Revitalising citizen-led democracy
We seek your feedback on Recommendation 1
How do you feel about this recommendation?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Ticked
Strongly disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Not sure
Do you have any comments?
Council decisions should be made by the elected Mayor and elected Councillors (only).
The mayor and councillors should be elected by the people that pay for the service. ie the ratepayers. Each person paying a full council rate should get one vote. If you dont pay rates, you dont get a vote
The mayor and councillors should be elected by the people that pay for the service. ie the ratepayers. Each person paying a full council rate should get one vote. If you dont pay rates, you dont get a vote
We seek your feedback on Recommendation 2
How do you feel about this recommendation?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly agree
Radio button:
Ticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Not sure
Do you have any comments?
Yes, laws need to be changed, so that Council decisions should be made by the elected Mayor and elected Councillors (only).
The mayor and councillors should be elected by the people that pay for the service. ie the ratepayers. Each person paying a full council rate should get one vote. If you dont pay rates, you dont get a vote
The mayor and councillors should be elected by the people that pay for the service. ie the ratepayers. Each person paying a full council rate should get one vote. If you dont pay rates, you dont get a vote
We seek your feedback on Recommendation 3
How do you feel about this recommendation?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Agree
Radio button:
Ticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Not sure
Do you have any comments?
What does "engage" mean?
The mayor and councillors can consult and engage with they who they like, but the mayor and the councillors should make the decisions alone based on the desires of the RATEPAYERS.
The mayor and councillors can consult and engage with they who they like, but the mayor and the councillors should make the decisions alone based on the desires of the RATEPAYERS.
We seek your feedback on Recommendation 4
How do you feel about this recommendation?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Ticked
Strongly disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Not sure
Do you have any comments?
Why?
I would prefer that the council put more effort into engaging with and understanding the RATEPAYERS
I would prefer that the council put more effort into engaging with and understanding the RATEPAYERS
We seek your feedback on Recommendation 5
How do you feel about this recommendation?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Ticked
Strongly disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Not sure
Do you have any comments?
The RATEPAYER should be in control of the way the council operates. They should not be paying for stuff outside of delivering core services
Question: What might we do more of to increase community understanding about the role of local government, and therefore lead to greater civic participation?
Type your comments below.
Its the ratepayers the council needs to listen to. Not kids.
Do you have any further feedback on Chapter 2: Revitalizing citizen-led democracy?
Type your comments below.
Not a very good set of recommendation is it!
You need to start again by thinking about who you serve, and thats the ratepayers
You need to start again by thinking about who you serve, and thats the ratepayers
Chapter 3: A Tiriti-based partnership between Māori and local government
We seek your feedback on Recommendation 6
How do you feel about this recommendation?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Ticked
Strongly disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Not sure
Do you have any comments?
Thats irrelevant
We seek your feedback on Recommendation 7
How do you feel about this recommendation?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Ticked
Strongly disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Not sure
Do you have any comments?
Ratepayers should be the only governors
We seek your feedback on Recommendation 8
How do you feel about this recommendation?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Ticked
Strongly disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Not sure
Do you have any comments?
Why?
We seek your feedback on Recommendation 9
How do you feel about this recommendation?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Ticked
Strongly disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Not sure
Do you have any comments?
This is just meaningless waffle
We seek your feedback on Recommendation 10
How do you feel about this recommendation?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Ticked
Strongly disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Not sure
Do you have any comments?
Why? what are you trying to achieve? Just employ the best workers
We seek your feedback on Recommendation 11
How do you feel about this recommendation?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Ticked
Strongly disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Not sure
Do you have any comments?
Waste of money
Do you have any further feedback on Chapter 3: A Tiriti-based partnership between Māori and local government?
Tell us your suggestions.
ignore it
Chapter 4: Allocating roles and functions in a way that enhances local wellbeing
We seek your feedback on Recommendation 12
How do you feel about this recommendation?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Ticked
Strongly disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Not sure
Do you have any comments?
Its totally unclear what change is being proposed
We seek your feedback on Recommendation 13
How do you feel about this recommendation?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Ticked
Strongly disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Not sure
Do you have any comments?
This is just word salad
Questions: What process would need to be created to support and agree on the allocation of roles and functions across central government, local government, and communities?
Type your comments below.
Lets start by getting the Mayor and Councillors to take the actions that their ratepayers desire.
What conditions will need to be in place to ensure the flexibility of the approach proposed does not create confusion or unnecessary uncertainty?
Type your comments below.
Mayor and Councillors should answer to the ratepayers. No-one else, including central government
What additional principles, if any, need to be considered?
Type your comments below.
Dont understand what you are talking about here.
"The process for allocating of roles and functions should be underpinned by te ao Māori values." that statement is nonsense. Why? There is no reason at all
"The process for allocating of roles and functions should be underpinned by te ao Māori values." that statement is nonsense. Why? There is no reason at all
Chapter 5: Local government as champion and activator of wellbeing
We seek your feedback on Recommendation 14
1. Lead, facilitate and support innovation and experimentation in achieving greater social, economic, cultural, and environmental wellbeing outcomes?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly agree
Radio button:
Ticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Not sure
2. Build relational, partnering, innovation and co-design capability and capacity across their whole organisation?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly agree
Radio button:
Ticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Not sure
3. Embed social/progressive procurement and supplier diversity as standard practice in local government with nationally supported organisational infrastructure and capability and capacity building?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Ticked
Strongly disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Not sure
4. Review their levers and assets from an equity and wellbeing perspective and identify opportunities for strategic and transformational initiatives?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly agree
Radio button:
Ticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Not sure
5. Take on the anchor institution role initially through demonstration initiatives with targeted resources and peer support?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly disagree
Radio button:
Ticked
Not sure
6. Share the learning and emerging practice from innovation and experimentation of their enhanced wellbeing role?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly disagree
Radio button:
Ticked
Not sure
Do you have any comments?
Most of that they should be doing now in any case
"social/progressive procurement and supplier diversity" - this is just meaningless waffle.
Procurement and supply needs to be on quality and cost, in order to meet the needs of ratepayers
"social/progressive procurement and supplier diversity" - this is just meaningless waffle.
Procurement and supply needs to be on quality and cost, in order to meet the needs of ratepayers
Questions: What feedback do you have on the roles councils can play to enhance intergenerational wellbeing?
Type your comments below.
This is just waffle. What actual change is proposed?
Chapter 6: A stronger relationship between central and local government
Questions: Tell us your thoughts on building on current strengths and resources.
1. The conditions for success, and what are the barriers that are preventing strong relationships?
Central government already impose too many statutory obligations on councils. Need to let councils govern themselves more, answering to the RATEPAYERS.
How can central and local government explore options that empower and enable a role for hapū/iwi in local governance in partnership with local and central government? These options should recognise the contribution of hapū/iwi rangatiratanga, kaitiakitanga and other roles.
Type your comments below.
"These options should recognise the contribution of hapū/iwi rangatiratanga, kaitiakitanga and other roles"
How can a government put stuff like this in a consultative document? Noone has a clue what you are talking about
How can a government put stuff like this in a consultative document? Noone has a clue what you are talking about
Chapter 7: Replenishing and building on representative democracy
We seek your feedback on Recommendation 15
How do you feel about this recommendation?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Ticked
Strongly disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Not sure
Do you have any comments?
"initiatives to promote diversity of candidates" What has this to do with central government? They should advocating for the most skilled candidates.
As for the rest of the proposals, these are just solutions in search of a problem. What is the logic and business case for this, what will be achieved?
As for the rest of the proposals, these are just solutions in search of a problem. What is the logic and business case for this, what will be achieved?
We seek your feedback on Recommendation 16
1. Adopt Single Transferrable Vote as the voting method in council elections?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly agree
Radio button:
Ticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Not sure
2. Lower the eligible voting age in local body elections to the age of 16?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Ticked
Strongly disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Not sure
3. Provide for a 4-year local electoral term?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly agree
Radio button:
Ticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Not sure
4. Amend the employment provisions of chief executives to match those in the wider public sector, and include mechanisms to assist in managing the employment relationship?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly disagree
Radio button:
Ticked
Not sure
Do you have any comments?
The only people voting should be ratepayers. One vote for each full rate paid.
The current system already has more people voting than are paying the rates. The tail is already wagging the dog. Give the sole votes to RATEPAYERS
The current system already has more people voting than are paying the rates. The tail is already wagging the dog. Give the sole votes to RATEPAYERS
We seek your feedback on Recommendation 17
How do you feel about this recommendation?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Agree
Radio button:
Ticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Not sure
Do you have any comments?
Who is going to fund it? Councils are already bloated and spending too much on salaries.
We need to reduce bureaucracy and expense , not increase it! Mayor and Councillors should be chosen from full RATEPAYERS only
We need to reduce bureaucracy and expense , not increase it! Mayor and Councillors should be chosen from full RATEPAYERS only
We seek your feedback on Recommendation 18
How do you feel about this recommendation?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Agree
Radio button:
Ticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Not sure
Do you have any comments?
Dont agree with a mandatory programme. Again, who is funding it?
We seek your feedback on Recommendation 19
1. Support and enable councils to undertake regular health checks of their democratic performance?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Agree
Radio button:
Ticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Not sure
2. Develop guidance and mechanisms to support councils resolving complaints under their code of conduct and explore a specific option for local government to refer complaints to an independent investigation process, conducted and led by a national organisation?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Agree
Radio button:
Ticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Not sure
3. Subject to the findings of current relevant ombudsman’s investigations, assess whether the provisions of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987, and how it is being applied, support high standards of openness and transparency?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Agree
Radio button:
Ticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Not sure
Do you have any comments?
Im rather scared this will increase bureaucracy and cost, for no benefit
We seek your feedback on Recommendation 20
How do you feel about this recommendation?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Ticked
Strongly disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Not sure
Do you have any comments?
Maori wards should not exist.
Ratepayers (only) should be voting. No racial selection needs to be brought into it
Ratepayers (only) should be voting. No racial selection needs to be brought into it
Chapter 8: Building an equitable, sustainable funding and financing system
We seek your feedback on Recommendation 21
How do you feel about this recommendation?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly disagree
Radio button:
Ticked
Not sure
Do you have any comments?
Its just waffle. how can we say whether we want that or not?
We seek your feedback on Recommendation 22
How do you feel about this recommendation?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly disagree
Radio button:
Ticked
Not sure
Do you have any comments?
Its as clear as mud
We seek your feedback on Recommendation 23
How do you feel about this recommendation?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Ticked
Strongly disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Not sure
Do you have any comments?
Most likely a huge bureaucratics and expensive operation, for no gain.
We seek your feedback on Recommendation 24
1. Enable councils to introduce new funding mechanisms?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly agree
Radio button:
Ticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Not sure
2. Retain rating as the principal mechanism for funding local government, while simplifying long-term planning and rating provisions to allow a more holistic and responsive process?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly disagree
Radio button:
Ticked
Not sure
Do you have any comments?
The Rating system is not sharing the load wide enough. Its not income related, as is Income tax. Its very unjust.
I support initiatives to reduce or remove the rating system
I support initiatives to reduce or remove the rating system
Chapter 10: System stewardship and support
We seek your feedback on Recommendation 29
How do you feel about this recommendation?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Ticked
Strongly disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Not sure
Do you have any comments?
Iwi and Hapu dont have any responsibility for stewardship. Leave this is to the elected reps
Questions: How can system stewardship be reimagined so that it is led across local government, hapū/iwi, and central government?
Type your comments below.
Reimagine it so only elected reps have a stewardship role
How do we embed Te Tiriti in local government system stewardship?
Type your comments below.
We dont need a partnership. We need to answer to RATEPAYERS betterr
Chapter 11: The pathway forward
Do you have any feedback on Chapter 11: The pathway forward?
Type your comments below.
Come up with proposals that do not include race, and which increase effectiveness whilst reducing costs
Final comments and supporting documents
If you have any final comments about what we have outlined in our draft report, please share these:
Type your comments below.
Im not impresse with these proposals, which dont offer better democracy or accountabilty. We dont need racial heritage brought into government, our county is full of people with wide diversity of origin, with many recent immigrants. These proposals largely ignore their needs